<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DBAToolZ &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbatoolz.com/t/tag/google/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbatoolz.com</link>
	<description>Lightweight Oracle DBA Tools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 01:17:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Oracle RAC&#8217;s share everything vs share nothing &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.dbatoolz.com/t/oracle-racs-share-everything-vs-share-nothing.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.dbatoolz.com/t/oracle-racs-share-everything-vs-share-nothing.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MVE</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share nothing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbatoolz.com/?p=342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s share nothing approach to application development has lead to the #1 search engine solution both in performance and functionality.  Notice that I said &#8220;application development&#8221; because for the share nothing approach to work it needs to be built into the application from day one not as an afterthought.
On the other end of the [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s <strong>share nothing</strong> approach to <strong>application development</strong> has lead to the #1 search engine solution both in performance and functionality.  Notice that I said &#8220;<strong>application development</strong>&#8221; because for the <strong>share nothing</strong> approach to work it needs to be built into the application from day one not as an afterthought.</p>
<p>On the other end of the spectrum we have ERP APPS where design with thousands of tables per module are the norm and the UNION ALL joins span a multi-page printout.  In these types of applications Oracle RAC&#8217;s &#8220;share everything&#8221; approach is clearly superior, scratch that, <em>it&#8217;s the only solution</em>, period.</p>
<p>For an interesting read on this specific issue take a look at Kevin Closson&#8217;s post titled &#8220;<a href="http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/2007/08/09/nearly-free-or-not-gridsql-for-enterprisedb-is-simply-better-than-real-application-clusters-it-is-shared-nothing-architecture-after-all/">Nearly Free or Not, GridSQL for EnterpriseDB is Simply Better Than Real Application Clusters. It is Shared-Nothing Architecture After All!</a>&#8221; and a sort of reply to it by a blogger called &#8220;bonglonglong&#8221; titled &#8220;<a href="http://bonglonglong.com/post/134">All in the assumptions</a>&#8220;.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dbatoolz.com/t/oracle-racs-share-everything-vs-share-nothing.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
